Desire and Justification

Dissertation, Queen's University at Kingston (Canada) (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We might consider, as if they must remain distinct, two questions: "Which of my desires should I act to satisfy?" and "What should I aim at that will make my life most worthwhile?" Thus construed, the first will appear to postulate an economics of desire-satisfaction, privileging segregated Desire over desirability; the second, postulating the existence of objective reasons and worth, will privilege "genuine" Desirability over desire. ;I argue that desire and desirability are inseparable. Given the emergence of self-consciousness, to the extent that the relationship between desire and desirability can no longer be fully grasped against the background of evolutionarily set value, their further, interdependent development is best understood in terms of their indeterminate, dialogical construction. The moral self-conception of self-conscious beings presupposes no radical capacity to transcend the constraints of contingent desire, nor any concomitant promise of reasoned emancipation predicated on the cognizance of moral necessity. It will follow that ethical theory can provide no account which both explains and justifies a universalist, objective morality. ;I argue, further, that our self-conception is nonetheless necessarily a conception of self-in-relation-to-others. Our understanding of agency and action, at once, is possible only through the sanctioning exchange of justificatory accounts. While prescinding from appeals to the Unconditioned, I adumbrate a version of a universal "internal view"--a view which cannot sensibly be called pre-reflective. Responsibility, accordingly, is seen to require the pragmatic limitation of excusing conditions, the conditioned nature of action notwithstanding. ;To this point, I will have used for illustrative purposes various attempts to classify excuses. I conclude with a more sustained argument against any attempt to categorize excuses and justifications in isolation from one another, tracing the plausibility of such a separation to erroneous convictions exposed in the previous chapters.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Conflicts of Desire.Steven Arkonovich - 2012 - Journal of Value Inquiry 46 (1):51-63.
Defending Desire: Scanlon’s Anti-Humeanism.Steven Arkonovich - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (3):499-519.
The authority of desire.Dennis W. Stampe - 1987 - Philosophical Review 96 (July):335-81.
Desire-Based Theories of Reasons, Pleasure and Welfare.Chris Heathwood - 2011 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 6:79-106.
Backgrounding desire.Philip Pettit & Michael Smith - 1990 - Philosophical Review 99 (4):565-592.
Philosophy and Desire.Hugh J. Silverman (ed.) - 2000 - New York: Routledge.
Deleuze's Conception of Desire.Jihai Gao - 2013 - Deleuze and Guatarri Studies 7 (3):406-420.
The alluringness of desire.Daniel Friedrich - 2012 - Philosophical Explorations 15 (3):291 - 302.
先秦儒家关于“欲”的理论 (Pre-Qin Confucian Theory on Human Desires).Keqian Xu - 2006 - 中州学刊 (Academic Journal of Zhongzhou) 2006 (1):166-170.
A Puzzle About Desire.Chase B. Wrenn - 2010 - Erkenntnis 73 (2):185-209.
Justifying Desires.Uriah Kriegel - 2013 - Metaphilosophy 44 (3):335-349.
Absent Desires.Toby Handfield - 2011 - Utilitas 23 (4):402-427.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references