Philosophy Research Archives 9:279-292 (1983)
AbstractAccording to many critics, Descartes argued in a circle when he presumed to base the certainty of propositions that fulfill his epistemic criterion of being “clearly and distinctly perceived” on the demonstration that God exists and is not a deceiver. But his critics say, that demonstration, as he presented it, presupposed the validity of the same epistemic criterion. I critically examine two major strategies to dispel the appearance of circularity, two ways of interpreting Descartes’ argument.My approach shares with the second strategy the contention that Descartes did adopt the principle that “whatever is clearly and distinctly perceived to be true is true,” prior to his consideration of the God question. Moreover, his demonstration of God’s existence and veracity made use of the principle. But my claim is that the knowledge of God’s existence and veracity is not used to validate the principle of clear and distinct perception. It is used rather to defeat the sceptic’s argument that we cannot have any knowledge of the external, physical world. I proceed to present and explain Descartes’ argument centered around the thesis, “I cannot be certain that any of my representational ideas of the external world are veridical, unless I am certain that, God exists and is not a deceiver.” That is, I prove why, for Descartes, is necessary for. My discussion exposes some new facets to the principle of clear and distinct perception and reveals the fact that some familiar Cartesian distinctions that were not thought to be relevant to the problem of the Cartesian Circle are crucial to the solution of that problem.
Similar books and articles
A Journey Around the Cartesian Circle.Ewing Y. Chinn - 1983 - Philosophy Research Archives 9:279-292.
A Virtuous Circle: Descartes's Quest for Certainty in the Middle Meditations.Michael Peter Smith - 1982 - Dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Descartes’ Lumen Naturale and the Cartesian Circle.Dale Jacquette - 1996 - Philosophy and Theology 9 (3/4):273-320.
God and Descartes’ Principle of Clear and Distinct Knowledge.Sara F. García-gómez - 1988 - Philosophy Research Archives 14:283-302.
God and Descartes' Principle of Clear and Distinct Knowledge.Sara F. García-gómez - 1988 - Philosophy Research Archives 14:283-302.
Descartes, the Cartesian Circle, and Epistemology Without God.Michael Della Rocca - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (1):1–33.
Clear and Distinct Perception in Descartes's Philosophy.Shoshana Smith - 2005 - Dissertation, University of California Berkeley
Against the New Cartesian Circle.Everett Fulmer & C. P. Ragland - 2017 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 47 (1):66-74.
The Cartesian Circle.Gary Hatfield - 2006 - In Stephen Gaukroger (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Descartes' Meditations. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 122--141.
Doubt, Certainty, and the Cartesian Circle.Robert Stephen Welch - 1983 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst
The Problem of the Criterion, Skepticism, and the Cartesian Circle.Timo Kajamies - 2006 - SATS 7 (2):43-62.
The Cartesian Circle and Two Forms of Scepticism.Ruth Weintraub - 1997 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 14 (4):365 - 377.
Dissolving the Skeptical Paradox of Knowledge Via Cartesian Skepticism Based on Wittgenstein.Ken Shigeta - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 53:241-247.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads