Philosophical and sociocultural dimensions of personality psychological security

Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 14:73-83 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Purpose. The dynamics and pace of social and economic transformations that are characteristic of modern society, lead to an increase in tension and the destruction of habitual stereotypes – ideals, values, norms, patterns of behaviour that unite people. These moments encourage us to rethink the understanding of "security" essence, in particular, psychological, which emphasizes the urgency of its study in the philosophical and sociocultural coordinates. Theoretical basis of the research is based on the philosophical methodology of K. Jaspers, E. Fromm and the A. Maslow’s psychological approach to understanding of a person. Originality. Psychological security is considered at different levels: first and foremost, society is a characteristic of social security, that is an analysis of how today’s social technologies, social changes affect the quality of life of the country’s population; secondly, the social environment – the family, the immediate environment, reference groups, training teams; thirdly, a person is an experience of his own security-insecurity, when it is possible to talk about the manifestations of psychological violence, when certain behavioral acts contribute to the violation of the security of the other or to self-destruction. It is found out that the knowledge of psychological security is closely connected with the socio-historical conditions of being, with the level of development of material and spiritual culture, with the interests and values prevailing in society, which determines its ontological, epistemological and axiological features. The presented issue is considered in the correlation of psychological security with types of scientific rationality – classical, nonclassical and post-nonclassical approaches, within the framework of which various perspectives, aspects, forms and types of psychological security are studied. Conclusions. The concept of security requires a systematic description of its manifestations, types, levels, concepts: security as the absence of dangers ; security as a certain activity to ensure or to prevent any threats or dangers ; security as a conscious necessity, the value of the individual. The study systematizes various ideas about psychological security in accordance with the logic of scientific knowledge: in the mainstream of classical, non-classical and post-nonclassical approaches.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Категорія інформаційної безпеки у вітчизняному філософсько-політологічному дискурсі.К. В Захаренко - 2018 - Гуманітарний Вісник Запорізької Державної Інженерної Академії 72:44-52.
The Fascist Moment: Security, Exclusion, Extermination.Mark Neocleous - 2009 - Studies in Social Justice 3 (1):23-37.
Security: Against What? For What? With What?André Gorz - 1983 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1983 (58):158-168.
Security, Knowledge and Well-being.Stephen John - 2011 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (1):68-91.
Reve{a,i}ling the Risks.Wolter Pieters - 2010 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 14 (3):194-206.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-03

Downloads
15 (#938,320)

6 months
10 (#260,500)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations