On Evans's Vague Object from Set Theoretic Viewpoint

Journal of Philosophical Logic 35 (4):423-434 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Gareth Evans proved that if two objects are indeterminately equal then they are different in reality. He insisted that this contradicts the assumption that there can be vague objects. However we show the consistency between Evans's proof and the existence of vague objects within classical logic. We formalize Evans's proof in a set theory without the axiom of extensionality, and we define a set to be vague if it violates extensionality with respect to some other set. There exist models of set theory where the axiom of extensionality does not hold, so this shows that there can be vague objects

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
57 (#273,709)

6 months
10 (#383,927)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

The strength of extensionality I—weak weak set theories with infinity.Kentaro Sato - 2009 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 157 (2-3):234-268.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Can there be vague objects?Gareth Evans - 1978 - Analysis 38 (4):208.
The iterative conception of set.George Boolos - 1971 - Journal of Philosophy 68 (8):215-231.
Wang's paradox.Michael Dummett - 1975 - Synthese 30 (3-4):201--32.
Can there be vague objects?Gareth Evans - 2004 - In Tim Crane & Katalin Farkas (eds.), Metaphysics: a guide and anthology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Concepts without boundaries.R. M. Sainsbury - 1996 - In Rosanna Keefe & Peter Smith (eds.), Vagueness: A Reader. MIT Press. pp. 186-205.

View all 19 references / Add more references