Aggregate judgment under uncertainty-weighting by graininess and discounting of opinions

Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 30 (6):483-484 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,532

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Intergenerational Impartiality: Replacing Discounting by Probability Weighting.Ng Yew-Kwang - 2005 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (3):237-257.
Intergenerational impartiality: Replacing discounting by probability weighting. [REVIEW]Yew-Kwang Ng - 2005 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (3):237-257.
Measurement-theoretic foundations of time discounting in economics.Conrad Heilmann - 2008 - The Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science (CPNSS), London School of Economics.
Responsibly Managing Uncertainties In Clinical Ethics.L. B. McCullough - 2012 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (1):1-5.
A bazaar of opinions mostly fit within picoeconomics.George Ainslie - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):664-670.
Weighting models and weighting factors.Gottfried Vosgerau & Matthis Synofzik - 2012 - Consciousness and Cognition 21 (1):55-58.
Up and down with aggregation.Brad Hooker - 2009 - Social Philosophy and Policy 26 (1):126-147.
Which worlds are possible? A judgment aggregation problem.Christian List - 2008 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 37 (1):57 - 65.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-01

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references