The Philosophy of Ambivalence: Sandra Harding on The Science Question in Feminism

Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 13:58-73 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the past three decades scholars in virtually every humanistic and social scientific research discipline, and in some natural sciences, have drawn attention to quite striking instances of gender bias in the modes of practice and theorizing typical of traditional fields of research. They generally begin by identifying explicit androcentric biases in definitions of the subject domains appropriate to specific scientific fields. Their primary targets, in this connection, have been research that leaves women out altogether, research that ignores women’s contributions or victimization, and research that conceptualizes its subject, male or female, human or non-human, in explicitly gender biased terms.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Science Question in Feminism.Sandra Harding - 1988 - Hypatia 3 (1):157-168.
The Science Question in Feminism.Sandra Harding - 1988 - Synthese 76 (3):441-446.
From the woman question in science to the science question in feminism.Sandra Harding - 2005 - In Nico Stehr & Reiner Grundmann (eds.), Knowledge: Critical Concepts. Routledge. pp. 327--342.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-21

Downloads
5 (#1,542,231)

6 months
1 (#1,474,534)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alison Wylie
University of British Columbia

Citations of this work

Feminist Philosophy of Science: Standpoint Matters.Alison Wylie - 2012 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophy Association 86 (2):47-76.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references