The Date of the Athenian-Roman foedus

Klio 103 (1):90-96 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

SummaryThis paper argues that the Tacitean passage (Annales 2.53.3) referring to an actual foedus between Rome and Athens should be accepted, and that the date for this treaty may be assigned to 191 BC.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Föderalität ohne Zwangsgewalt.Thomas Jacob - 2010 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 96 (3):309-321.
Fraternum Foedus. [REVIEW]Edward Bispham - 1999 - The Classical Review 49 (1):185-187.
The Fate of the Foedus Cassianum.J. Enoch Powell - 1934 - The Classical Review 48 (01):14-.
The Date of Livius Andronicus.Harold B. Mattingly - 1957 - Classical Quarterly 7 (3-4):159-.
The Date of Livius Andronicus.Harold B. Mattingly - 1957 - Classical Quarterly 7 (3-4):159-163.
On the Date for an Athenian Festival.O. Hansen - 1985 - Mnemosyne 38 (3-4):389-390.
Alguns pontos sobre o matrimônio como foedus.Luiz Henrique Bugnolo - 2001 - Revista de Cultura Teológica 36:87-112.
Nothing to do with democracy: Athenian drama and the polis.Peter J. Rhodes - 2003 - Journal of Hellenic Studies 123:104-119.
The Date of the Athenian Gold Coinage.Wesley E. Thompson - 1965 - American Journal of Philology 86 (2):159.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-06-10

Downloads
2 (#1,801,846)

6 months
2 (#1,188,460)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references