Reasoning, robots, and navigation: Dual roles for deductive and abductive reasoning

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):92-92 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Mercier & Sperber (M&S) argue for their argumentative theory in terms of communicative abilities. Insights can be gained by extending the discussion beyond human reasoning to rodent and robot navigation. The selection of arguments and conclusions that are mutually reinforcing can be cast as a form of abductive reasoning that I argue underlies the construction of cognitive maps in navigation tasks

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reasoning is for thinking, not just for arguing.Jonathan St Bt Evans - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):77-78.
The freak in all of us: Logical truth seeking without argumentation.Wim De Neys - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):75-76.
When reasoning is persuasive but wrong.Robert J. Sternberg - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):88-89.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
51 (#303,529)

6 months
23 (#153,987)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?