Philosophy 63 (243):29-42 (1988)
AbstractWhat is a natural kind? As we shall see, the concept of a natural kind has a long history. Many of the interesting doctrines can be detected in Aristotle, were revived by Locke and Leibniz, and have again become fashionable in recent years. Equally there has been agreement about certain paradigm examples: the kinds oak, stickleback and gold are natural kinds, and the kinds table, nation and banknote are not. Sadly agreement does not extend much further. It is impossible to discover a single consistent doctrine in the literature, and different discussions focus on different doctrines without writers or readers being aware of the fact. In this paper I shall attempt to find a defensible distinction between natural and non-natural kinds.
Similar books and articles
Locke, Natural Kinds, and Essentialism.Judith Kathryn Crane - 1999 - Dissertation, Tulane University
How to fix kind membership: A problem for hpc theory and a solution.Thomas A. C. Reydon - 2009 - Philosophy of Science 76 (5):724-736.
Diseases as natural kinds.Stefan Dragulinescu - 2010 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 31 (5):347-369.
Natural Kinds in Evolution and Systematics: Metaphysical and Epistemological Considerations.Ingo Brigandt - 2009 - Acta Biotheoretica 57 (1-2):77-97.
The problem of processes and transitions: are diseases phase kinds? [REVIEW]Stefan Dragulinescu - 2012 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (1):79-89.
Species, essences and the names of natural kinds.T. E. Wilkerson - 1994 - Philosophical Quarterly 44 (170):1-19.
A Trope Nominalist Theory of Natural Kinds.Markku Keinänen - 2015 - In Ghislain Guigon & Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (eds.), Nominalism about Properties. Routledge. pp. 156-174.
Do the Life Sciences Need Natural Kinds?Thomas A. Reydon - 2009 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 9 (2):167-190.
Why Hacking is wrong about human kinds.Rachel Cooper - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (1):73-85.
Following through on naturalistic approaches to natural kinds: P. D. Magnus: Scientific enquiry and natural kinds: From planets to mallards. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012, 222pp, £55.00, $80.00 HB.Miles MacLeod - 2013 - Metascience 23 (2):335-338.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Activities of kinding in scientific practice.Catherine Kendig - 2016 - In C. Kendig (ed.), Natural Kinds and Classification in Scientific Practice. Routledge.
Basic Racial Realism.Joshua Glasgow & Jonathan M. Woodward - 2015 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 1 (3):449--466.
No purely epistemic theory can account for the naturalness of kinds.Olivier Lemeire - 2018 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 12):2907-2925.
References found in this work
No references found.