Made for Another World

Philosophia Christi 19 (2):449-454 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

C. S. Lewis’s argument from desire is best understood as an argument to the best explanation. It has two weaknesses. First, it is not clear that everyone in fact has the experience it references. Second, even if it successfully points to the existence of some Desired Object not experienced in the finite temporal world, it cannot of itself show that this object is a god, much less the God of the Bible. Nevertheless, the argument does have value in confirming, for people who recognize themselves as having had the experience of sehnsucht, the more explicit conclusions reached by other arguments.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,963

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Swinburne on Natural Evil.David O'Connor - 1983 - Religious Studies 19 (1):65 - 73.
The Confucian Idea of Benevolence in the "Fu" of Yi Jing.Hung Tsai - 2002 - Philosophy and Culture 29 (2):174-177.
Against the notion of Ontological Primacy.Chris Brink - 2004 - South African Journal of Philosophy 23 (3):226-243.
Universalism as a Metaphilosophy.Michael H. Mitias - 2004 - Dialogue and Universalism 14 (10):87-101.
Technology as world building.Anne Chapman - 2004 - Ethics, Place and Environment 7 (1-2):59 – 72.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-10

Downloads
14 (#991,344)

6 months
2 (#1,200,611)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references