Dynamics, not kinematics, is an adequate basis for perception

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):709-710 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Roger Shepard's description of an abstract representational space defined by landmark objects and kinematic transformations between them fails to successfully capture the essence of the perceptual tasks he expects of it, such as object recognition. Ultimately, objects are recognized in the context of events. The dynamic nature of events is what determines the perceived kinematic behavior, and it is at the level of dynamics that events can be classified as types. [Shepard].

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Motion percepts: “Sense specific,” “kinematic,” or . . . ?A. H. Wertheim - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):338-340.
Is kinematic geometry an internalized regularity?Dejan Todorovič - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):641-651.
Evolutionary internalized regularities.Robert Schwartz - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):626-628.
Movement dynamics in speed/accuracy trade-off.P. Morasso & V. Sanguineti - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (2):319-319.
Hearing objects and events.Nick Young - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (11):2931-2950.
Kinematic models cannot provide insight into motor control.Arnold B. Mitnitski - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (2):318-319.
Internalized constraints in the representation of spatial layout.Helene Intraub - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):677-678.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
4 (#1,644,260)

6 months
21 (#133,716)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references