Reporting Potential Errors

International Journal of Applied Philosophy 32 (2):133-142 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Medical errors are the third leading cause of death in the United States, and there is growing consensus that medical errors should be discussed after they occur. This essay argues that potential errors should be discussed with patients as well in the informed consent process prior to treatment. While physicians don’t have the obligation to tell patients to go to physicians and hospitals that would present less potential for error, patients should be told of increased risks compared to other options, and be guided through the data on physician and hospital rankings. Suggestions are given to improve this informed consent process.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Improving the quality of drug error reporting.Gerry Armitage, Robert Newell & John Wright - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (6):1189-1197.
The uniqueness of software errors and their impact on global policy.Don Gotterbarn - 1998 - Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (3):351-356.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-02-12

Downloads
26 (#629,109)

6 months
9 (#354,585)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references