Problems in the Anacreontea

Classical Quarterly 34 (1):206-221 (1984)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The task of making a new Teubner edition of the Anacreontea has led me to realize how much still remains to be done for the text of these once celebrated but no w little-read poems, for which we depend on the same tenth-century manuscript as for the Palatine Anthology. In what follows I attempt to justify the new emendations adopted in the edition, and one or two old ones which have generally been dismissed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,150

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Problems in the Anacreontea.M. L. West - 1984 - Classical Quarterly 34 (01):206-.
Anacreontea.T. Kehrhahn - 1914 - Hermes 49 (4):481-507.
The Anacreontea. [REVIEW]A. S. Owen - 1916 - The Classical Review 30 (7):197-198.
Anacreon And Anacreontea. [REVIEW]Bonnie MacLachlan - 2004 - The Classical Review 54 (2):297-299.
Preisendanz's Carmina Anacreontea. [REVIEW]J. M. Edmonds - 1914 - The Classical Review 28 (4):132-133.
On the metre of Anacreont. 19W.Marco Fantuzzi - 1994 - Classical Quarterly 44 (02):540-.
Further Emendations in the Fragments of Theophrastus.Edward S. Forster - 1933 - Classical Quarterly 27 (3-4):140-141.
The Question of Mens in Lucretius 2.289.I. Avotins - 1979 - Classical Quarterly 29 (1):95-100.
The Question of Mens in Lucretius 2.289.I. Avotins - 1979 - Classical Quarterly 29 (01):95-.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-20

Downloads
5 (#1,542,736)

6 months
5 (#644,465)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references