Some Comments on the Nature of Mathematieal Logic

New Scholasticism 16 (1):9-15 (1942)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

00286621

DOI

10.5840/newscholas19421612

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Wellmuth John J.. Some comments on the nature of mathematical logic. The new scholasticism, vol. 16 , pp. 9–15.Alonzo Church - 1942 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 7 (1):39-40.
Review: John J. Wellmuth, Some Comments on the Nature of Mathematical Logic. [REVIEW]Alonzo Church - 1942 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 7 (1):39-40.
Reverend John F. McCormick, S. J.: In Memoriam.Anton Pegis - 1943 - New Scholasticism 17 (4):303-306.
The Material Logic of John of St. Thomas. [REVIEW]R. W. Schmidt - 1956 - New Scholasticism 30 (2):232-234.
The Material Logic of John of St. Thomas. [REVIEW]R. W. Schmidt - 1956 - New Scholasticism 30 (2):232-234.
John of St. Thomas and Mathematical Logic.John J. Doyle - 1953 - New Scholasticism 27 (1):3-38.
Notes and Comments.[author unknown] - 1938 - New Scholasticism 12 (4):422-423.
Notes and Comments.[author unknown] - 1937 - New Scholasticism 11 (3):293-293.
Notes and Comments.[author unknown] - 1938 - New Scholasticism 12 (3):309-309.
Notes and Comments.[author unknown] - 1939 - New Scholasticism 13 (2):201-201.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
43 (#110,248)

6 months
1 (#1,912,481)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references