The Justification of PunishmentPunishment and Responsibility, Essays in Philosophy of Law

Review of Metaphysics 25 (3):527-546 (1972)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Hart commences his essays by stating what he thinks is the search and its concomitant questions. The search he asserts is for principles to justify punishment. Unfortunately, no attempt is made to describe criteria of justification, let alone what is meant by principles. The questions that arise are in terms of giving a general justification for punishing individuals and for determining the severity of that punishment; and of establishing the appropriate method for selection of objects of punishment. No reference is made to a general societal system, nor to the nature of a whole criminal process functioning from statutes through police, to courts and judges. He then describes a "General Justifying Aim" and a system of distribution of punishment.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Justification of Punishment.Jonathan A. Weiss - 1972 - Review of Metaphysics 25 (3):527 - 546.
Why Punish the Guilty?Cyril McDonnell - 2008 - Maynooth Philosophical Papers 5:21-34.
Liberalism and the general justifiability of punishment.Nathan Hanna - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 145 (3):325-349.
Punishment and Moral Sentiments.Thom Brooks - 2012 - Review of Metaphysics 66 (2):281-293.
Hart on Responsibility.C. G. Pulman (ed.) - 2014 - New York, NY: Palgrave-Macmillan.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-10

Downloads
3 (#1,213,485)

6 months
2 (#1,816,284)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references