Philosophical Concepts, the Ideal of Sublimation, and the “Unpredictability of Human Behaviour”

Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 9 (4):27-37 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Wittgenstein famously criticizes the philosophical practice of analyzing the meaning of words outside their ordinary use in everyday language, whereby often self-made pseudo-problems arise. In order to shed further light on Wittgenstein’s critique, this article makes use of the Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology. First, starting from the remark in Vol. I, §52, his criticism of the philosophical method of selection and generalization is explained in detail. Next, I give a brief outline of Wittgenstein’s own way of philosophizing by reference to a selection of comments concerning the use of psychological words in everyday language, which will also further elucidate his critique. Finally, I enter into the question which significance everyday language according to Wittgenstein has for philosophy.

Similar books and articles

Philosophy and the Ordinary.Laura Arcila Villa - 2004 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo
Wittgenstein on knowledge: a critique.Raquel Krempel - 2015 - Synthese 192 (3):723-734.
Wittgenstein, Ordinary Language, and Poeticity.David Hommen - 2020 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy (AO):313-334.
Wittgenstein, Ordinary Language, and Poeticity.David Hommen - 2021 - Kriterion – Journal of Philosophy 35 (4):313-334.
Wittgenstein on Language, Meaning, and Use.Dan Nesher - 1992 - International Philosophical Quarterly 32 (1):55-78.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-04-20

Downloads
165 (#116,968)

6 months
86 (#65,814)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Anja Weiberg
University of Vienna

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Yellow Book.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1933 - In Alice Ambrose (ed.), Wittgenstein’s Lectures: Cambridge, 1932--35. Blackwell. pp. 41--73.

Add more references