Abstract

This article aims to explore the contemporary master of Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics hermeneutics ideas. Since the modern theory of hermeneutics after Heidegger, hermeneutics and methodology into ontological hermeneutics controversy between the two factions, stand up to the United States is based on Heidegger's understanding of "this in the" on the basis of existence, back to Plato's dialectic dialogue through the creation of Hegel's dialectic philosophy of hermeneutics, the philosophy of the future generations and a significant impact on literary theory. Up to now explore the beauty of the literature of philosophical hermeneutics, Gadamer on Plato most of the discussion, instead of hermeneutics as a separate, but ignored up to the United States only through the interpretation of Plato, the essence of philosophical hermeneutics in order to have their fully grasp. This article attempts to interpret Plato up to the United States, to explore its relationship with the philosophy of hermeneutics. Up back to the United States through the lively dialogues of Plato, one to one conversation, to reveal the limited nature of human knowledge. Not a rigorous interpretation of the rules of the social sciences, but a person with his participation in the process of creating meaning. The is a brief study of Hans-Georg Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics. Since the publication of Martin Heidegger's Sein und Zeitin 1927, the hermeneutics are distinguished between traditional or methodological and radical or ontological hermeneutics. Based on early Heidergger's work, Gadamer interprets comprehension in ontological terms as one of the components of Dasein. It traces back to Plato's dialogue, and applies Hegel's dialectics. Further, Gadamer develops his philosophical hermeneutics, which has a tremendous impact on contemporary philosophy and literature. Most commentators on Gadamer's work, however, separate his work on Plato from his work on hermeneutics. This essay attempts to show that Gadamer's hermeneutics discloses itself in its most distinctive contours only in the light of his work on Plato. In going back to Plato, Gadamer tells us, that any true conversations do not proceed geometrico, Instead, we move back and forth, and it manifests the limitedness of all human knowing. Thus, hermeneutics is concerned not with the justification of interpretive understanding as knowledge or science, but rather it deals with different matters altogether