Commentary on Pat Robertson and the supreme court

Abstract

In response to the Supreme court’s ruling that equality was beginning to be recognized, people anti-sodomy laws are unconstitutional, like Pat Robertson pointed to the advancements evangelist Pat Robertson urged his followers to and called them evil. Twenty years from now, engage in what he called a 21- day “prayer..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Augustine and the Rhetoric of Roman Decline. Murphy - 2005 - History of Political Thought 26 (4):586-606.
New Atheism' versus 'Christian Nationalism.Graham Oppy - 2011 - In Paolo Diego Bubbio & Philip Andrew Quadrio (eds.), The relationship of philosophy to religion today. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press. pp. 118-53.
Day to Day in the Life of the Court.Lawrence S. Wrightsman - 2006 - In Lawrence S. Wrightsman (ed.), The Psychology of the Supreme Court. Oxford University Press.
Response to Pat Duffy Hutcheon.P. Hager - 1996 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 15:305-307.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
12 (#1,095,929)

6 months
12 (#306,771)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references