Just Inequalities of Power?

In Karl Marker, Annette Schmitt & Jürgen Sirsch (eds.), Demokratie und Entscheidung. Beiträge zur Analytischen Politischen Theorie. Springer. pp. 245-259 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The key difference between the two concepts is that power acts directly on the actions of others by providing incentives and penalties for action, whereas influence operates on beliefs. From this distinction it follows that the exercise of influence is not simply a sub-class of instances of the exercise of power. It can be perfectly reasonable to attribute influence where there is no power, as in the example of the influence of Cervantes on subsequent writers.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/978-3-658-24529-0_16

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Does Non-Domination Imply Freedom? A Discussion of the Neorepublican Conception of Freedom.Jürgen Sirsch & Doris Unger - 2018 - In Karl Marker, Annette Schmitt & Jürgen Sirsch (eds.), Demokratie und Entscheidung. Beiträge zur Analytischen Politischen Theorie. Springer. pp. 65-80.
Rational Choice and Asymmetric Learning in Iterated Social Interactions – Some Lessons from Agent-Based Modeling.Dominik Klein, Johannes Marx & Simon Scheller - 2018 - In Karl Marker, Annette Schmitt & Jürgen Sirsch (eds.), Demokratie und Entscheidung. Beiträge zur Analytischen Politischen Theorie. Springer. pp. 277-294.
Demokratie und Entscheidung. Beiträge zur Analytischen Politischen Theorie.Karl Marker, Annette Schmitt & Jürgen Sirsch (eds.) - 2018 - Springer.
Menschenwürde, Menschenrechte und Demokratie.Ernesto Garzón Valdés - 2018 - In Karl Marker, Annette Schmitt & Jürgen Sirsch (eds.), Demokratie und Entscheidung. Beiträge zur Analytischen Politischen Theorie. Springer. pp. 131-146.
Introduction.Karl Marker, Annette Schmitt & Jürgen Sirsch - 2018 - In Karl Marker, Annette Schmitt & Jürgen Sirsch (eds.), Demokratie und Entscheidung. Beiträge zur Analytischen Politischen Theorie. Springer. pp. 1-7.
Private and Political Exchange – Nozick’s Club vs. Buchanan’s Communitarian Contractarianism.Geoffrey Brennan & Hartmut Kliemt - 2018 - In Karl Marker, Annette Schmitt & Jürgen Sirsch (eds.), Demokratie und Entscheidung. Beiträge zur Analytischen Politischen Theorie. Springer. pp. 107-129.
Echte und unechte Wahlversprechen.Karl Marker - 2018 - In Karl Marker, Annette Schmitt & Jürgen Sirsch (eds.), Demokratie und Entscheidung. Beiträge zur Analytischen Politischen Theorie. Springer. pp. 295-338.
Action as the Exercise of a Two-Way Power.Kim Frost - 2013 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 56 (6):611-624.
Methodological Peculiarities of History in Light of Idealizational Theory of Science.Krzysztof Brzechczyn - 2009 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 97 (1):137-157.
Dirty Hands? No Problem!Annette Schmitt - 2018 - In Karl Marker, Annette Schmitt & Jürgen Sirsch (eds.), Demokratie und Entscheidung. Beiträge zur Analytischen Politischen Theorie. Springer. pp. 215-230.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-03-12

Downloads
3 (#1,732,180)

6 months
2 (#1,446,842)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references