Robert Watt
Oxford University
This article challenges three widespread assumptions about Kant’s argument for the antithesis of the Second Antinomy. The first assumption is that this argument consists of an argument for the claim that “[no] composite thing in the world consists of simple parts”, and a logically independent argument for the claim that “nothing simple exists anywhere in the world”. The second assumption is that when Kant argues that “[no] composite thing in the world consists of simple parts”, he is making a claim about the mereological structure of spatially extended things in particular, as opposed to a claim about the mereological structure of things in general. And the third assumption is that Kant’s argument for this part of the antithesis is based on a claim about the relationship between the size of the extension of a composite thing and the sizes of the extensions of the things of which this composite thing consists.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1515/agph-2019-2006
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,257
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Kant’s Antinomy of Teleology: In Defense of a Traditional Interpretation.Nabeel Hamid - 2018 - In Violetta Waibel & Margit Ruffing (eds.), Proceedings of the 12th Kant Congress. Berlin: De Gruyter. pp. 1641-1648.
Kant's Duplication Problem.Moltke S. Gram - 1980 - Dialectica 34 (1):17-59.
Kant’s First Antinomy.M. S. Gram - 1967 - The Monist 51 (4):499-518.
Kant's Antinomy of Reflective Judgment: A Re-Evaluation.Alix Cohen - 2004 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 23 (1):183.
Kant’s First Antinomy.M. S. Gram - 1967 - The Monist 51 (4):499-518.
The Antinomies and Kant's Conception of Nature.Idan Shimony - 2013 - Dissertation, Tel Aviv University
Unlocking the Second Antinomy: Kant and Wolff.Michael Radner - 1998 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 36 (3):413-441.


Added to PP index

Total views
17 ( #633,507 of 2,499,746 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,066 of 2,499,746 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes