Givenness and Cognition: Reply to Grüne and Chignell

Journal of the History of Philosophy 55 (1):143-152 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

stefanie grüne takes issue with our claim that for an object to be given, this object must exist. On her view, givenness, according to Kant, does not require the existence of the object, but only its real possibility. She develops her critique in three steps. First, she argues that the reason why Kant requires objects to be given in intuition is that otherwise our concepts would not have ‘objective reality’ and would thus not constitute cognitions. But since the objective reality of a concept corresponds to the real possibility of its object, this is supposed to show that givenness does not require existence. Second, she challenges our remarks on mathematical cognition, claiming that in the...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-21

Downloads
62 (#253,311)

6 months
12 (#306,771)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Eric Watkins
University of California, San Diego
Marcus Willaschek
Goethe University Frankfurt

Citations of this work

Kantian Conceptualism/Nonconceptualism.Colin McLear - 2020 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Making Kant's Empirical Realism Possible.Simon Gurofsky - 2018 - Dissertation, University of Chicago

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references