Robert N. Moles, Definition and Rule in Legal Theory: A Reassessment of HLA Hart and the Positivist Tradition Reviewed by

Philosophy in Review 8 (5):181-183 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Raz on Detachment, Acceptance and Describability.Kevin Toh - 2007 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 27 (3):403-427.
Hart, legal rules and Palm tree justice.WilfridJ Waluchow - 1985 - Law and Philosophy 4 (1):41 - 70.
Legal reasoning and legal theory revisited.Fernando Atria - 1999 - Law and Philosophy 18 (5):537-577.
In Defense of Hart.Matthew H. Kramer - 2013 - In Wil Waluchow & Stefan Sciaraffa (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of the Nature of Law. Oxford University Press. pp. 22.
On Hart's ways : law as reason and as fact.John Finnis - 2007 - American Journal of Jurisprudence 52 (1):25-53.
Legal reasoning and legal theory.Neil MacCormick (ed.) - 1978 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Hart, Raz and the concept of a legal system.Sean Coyle - 2002 - Law and Philosophy 21 (3):275-304.
Is the Rule of Recognition Really a Conventional Rule?Julie Dickson - 2007 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 27 (3):373-402.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-16

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references