Intelligent Design—Fundamentalismus oder unbequeme Herausforderung? [Intelligent Design—Fundamentalism or Uncomfortable Challenge?]

Studia Gilsoniana 6 (2):287–321 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Order and change in nature have been for a long time understood in philosophy and theology as founded in divine reason. In the neo-Darwinist theory of evolution, their explanation is reduced to material change without reason. Molecular biologists like M. Behe and W. Demski argue that any reductionist explanation of living beings must be wrong. The evolution of irreducible complex structures is impossible on the basis of random variation and natural selection alone, and must be the result of intelligent design. The article argues that ID-theory, unlike Biblical Creationism, is a challenge for neo-Darwinism and for modern theology as well—for, unlike the Roman magisterium, many Catholic theologians try to harmonize reductive explanation with the notion of creation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Darwin and Intelligent Design.Francisco J. Ayala - 2010 - In Melville Y. Stewart (ed.), Science and Religion in Dialogue. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 283-294.
St. Thomas Aquinas on Intelligent Design.Robert C. Koons & Logan Paul Gage - 2011 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 85:79-97.
What is wrong with intelligent design?Gregory W. Dawes - 2007 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 61 (2):69 - 81.
Explanation of Intelligent Design and its Challenges with Evolutionary Theory.Haleh Abdollahi Rad - 2016 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations 10 (19):303-326.
Explanation of Intelligent Design and its Challenges with Evolutionary Theory.Haleh Abdollahi Rad - 2016 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations at University of Tabriz 10 (19):303-326.
A Scientific and Religious Critique of Intelligent Design.Stephen Matheson - 2010 - In Melville Y. Stewart (ed.), Science and Religion in Dialogue. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 278--289.
Can a Thomist Be a Darwinist?Logan Paul Gage - 2010 - In Jay Wesley Richards (ed.), God and Evolution. Discovery Inst. pp. 187-202.
Gilson, Darwin, and Intelligent Design.Desmond J. FitzGerald - 2015 - Studia Gilsoniana 4 (4):349–361.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-16

Downloads
3 (#1,730,340)

6 months
3 (#1,206,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references