'Can' without Possible Worlds: Semantics for Anti-Humeans

Philosophers' Imprint 13 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Metaphysicians of modality are increasingly critical of possible-worlds talk, and increasingly happy to accept irreducibly modal properties – and in particular, irreducible dispositions – in nature. The aim of this paper is to provide the beginnings of a modal semantics which uses, instead of possible-worlds talk, the resources of such an 'anti-Humean' metaphysics. One central challenge to an anti-Humean view is the context-sensitivity of modal language. I show how that challenge can be met and a systematic modal semantics provided, given an independently plausible metaphysics of dispositional properties or potentialities

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-08-02

Downloads
360 (#6,623)

6 months
32 (#484,314)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Barbara Vetter
Freie Universität Berlin

Citations of this work

Agentive Modals.Matthew Mandelkern, Ginger Schultheis & David Boylan - 2017 - Philosophical Review 126 (3):301-343.
Able to Do the Impossible.Jack Spencer - 2017 - Mind 126 (502):466-497.
Williamsonian modal epistemology, possibility-based.Barbara Vetter - 2016 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46 (4-5):766-795.

View all 23 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references