Imperial Rome and Britain's Language of Empire 1600–1837

History of European Ideas 26 (3):211-224 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Britain's pre-Victorian overseas expansion stimulated Roman comparisons. But imperial Rome was a warning as much as an inspiration to future empires, a harsh and uncomfortable model for Britain as a former Roman colony. Roman dignity was claimed for British monarchs and achievements by Dryden and others. But there were mixed feelings about identifying expanding Britain as a second Roman Empire. In the eighteenth century the British freedom-fighter Caractacus, defeated by the Romans, appealed far more to popular taste than Virgil's Aeneas or the Emperor Augustus. Sustained unease about imperial Rome, going right back to Tacitus, anticipated the liberal critique of imperialism of some Victorian and Edwardian commentators.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Problem of `Imperial Historiography' in Rome.Fritz-Heiner Mutschler - 2008 - In Fritz-Heiner Mutschler & Achim Mittag (eds.), Conceiving the Empire: China and Rome Compared. Oxford University Press.
Imperial Britain at War.Karl W. Schweizer - 1997 - The European Legacy 2 (6):1031-1035.
John's Ironic Empire.David R. Barr - 2009 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 63 (1):20-30.
Image and Empire: The Shaping of Augustan Rome.Rolf Michael Schneider - 2008 - In Fritz-Heiner Mutschler & Achim Mittag (eds.), Conceiving the Empire: China and Rome Compared. Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-23

Downloads
24 (#653,725)

6 months
8 (#352,539)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references