Copeland B. J.. On when a semantics is not a semantics: some reasons for disliking the Routley–semantics for relevance logic. Journal of philosophical logic, vol. 8 , pp. 399–413 [Book Review]

Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (3):994-995 (1984)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A star-free semantics for R.Edwin D. Mares - 1995 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (2):579 - 590.
“Four-Valued” Semantics for the Relevant Logic R.Edwin D. Mares - 2004 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 33 (3):327-341.
Algebraic Kripke-Style Semantics for Relevance Logics.Eunsuk Yang - 2014 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 43 (4):803-826.
A relevant theory of conditionals.Edwin D. Mares & André Fuhrmann - 1995 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 24 (6):645 - 665.
Neighborhoods for entailment.Lou Goble - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (5):483-529.
Four-valued Logic.Katalin Bimbó & J. Michael Dunn - 2001 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 42 (3):171-192.
Truth-Maker Semantics for Intuitionistic Logic.Kit Fine - 2014 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 43 (2-3):549-577.
Sequence semantics for dynamic predicate logic.C. F. M. Vermeulen - 1993 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 2 (3):217-254.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
14 (#989,410)

6 months
2 (#1,196,523)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Johan Van Benthem
University of Amsterdam

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references