Anand Vaidya
San Jose State University
In this paper I propose a future direction for comparative philosophy on which it enters the space of public philosophy by capitalizing on the fact that it is already cross-cultural, and adding multi-disciplinary research to its proper foundation. This is not a new thesis. Rather, it is an ideological articulation of thought that is already underway in what is sometimes called fusion philosophy, as found in the work of Evan Thompson, Jay Garfield, or Christian Coseru. My articulation begins with a non-exhaustive delineation of distinct types of public-philosophy that are already well known in the public space. One core distinction I draw concerns how the very notion of ‘public philosophy’ can be understood. I distinguish between the philosophy-to-public direction of fit, on which philosophers enter the public space for some public benefit, and the public-to-philosophy direction of fit, on which the public plays a constructive role in guiding philosophers in some important epistemic manner. Because my position engages the issue of whether “philosophy” can truly be found outside of the west, I offer an account of the relation between science, religion, and philosophy with respect to inquiry into the human condition. In doing so I offer an argument against the view that philosophy can only be found in the west based on the difference between a term in a language and what the term picks out. I close with a discussion of how analytic philosophy, comparative philosophy, and experimental philosophy can come together to form one kind of bidirectional public philosophy.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.31979/2151-6014(2015).060206
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,337
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Justice: What's the Right Thing to Do?Michael J. Sandel (ed.) - 2009 - Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Is Public Philosophy Possible?Steven P. Lee - 2008 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (1):13-18.
What Does Public Philosophy Do?Jack Russell Weinstein - 2014 - Essays in Philosophy 15 (1):33-57.
Philosophy in American Public Life.Jorge J. E. Gracia - 2001 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 11:129-140.
The Disappearance of the Public Good: Confucius, Dewey, Rorty.Joseph Grange - 1996 - Philosophy East and West 46 (3):351-366.
Public Space.James Mensch - 2007 - Continental Philosophy Review 40 (1):31-47.
What is a Pragmatic Philosophy?[author unknown] - unknown
Writing Philosophy for the Public is a Moral Obligation.Greg Littmann - 2014 - Essays in Philosophy 15 (1):103-116.
Investigations on Public Philosophy.H. E. Huaihong - 2007 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (1):84-94.
Feminism, the Public and the Private.Joan B. Landes (ed.) - 1998 - Oxford University Press.
Public Reason.David Gauthier - 1995 - Social Philosophy and Policy 12 (1):19-42.


Added to PP index

Total views
36 ( #316,206 of 2,507,888 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,715 of 2,507,888 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes