Science and the possibility of philosophy

In S. Phineas Upham & Joshua Harlan (eds.), Philosophers in Conversation: Interviews From the Harvard Review of Philosophy. Routledge (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Nothing reliable about genes or environment: new perspectives on analysis of similarity among relatives in light of the possibility of underlying heterogeneity.Peter J. Taylor - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 40 (3):210-220.
Descartes and the possibility of science.Peter A. Schouls - 2000 - Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Junk Representations.Lawrence A. Shapiro - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (3):345-361.
Current Philosophy of Science.Joseph Agassi - 2011 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 41 (2):278-294.
Introduction: Conceivability and possibility.Tamar Szabó Gendler & John Hawthorne - 2002 - In T. Szabó Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Conceivability and Possibility. Oxford University Press. pp. 1--70.
On the relations between (neo-classical) philosophy of science and logic.Roberto Festa - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):511-520.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Unger
New York University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references