Author’s Response: Identifying a Philosophy and Methods for Second-Order Science

Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):39-45 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Upshot: The work that scientists do, particularly social scientists, is currently constrained by their conception of science. Expanding the conception of science would lead to more innovative work and more rapid social progress

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Second-Order Science: Logic, Strategies, Methods.S. A. Umpleby - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):16-23.
Do We also Need Second-order Mathematics?J. P. Van Bendegem - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):34-35.
Second-Order Science, Unity of Science and Methods of Research.B. R. Hornung - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):30-31.
Science Is not Value-free.J. Stewart - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):28-29.
The Promise and Prospects of Second-Order Science.D. Rousseau - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):37-38.
Second-Order Science is Enacted Constructivism.M. R. Lissack - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):35-37.
Second-Order Observation in Social Science: Autopoietic Foundations.E. Buchinger - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):32-33.
Observer Effects in Research.M. C. Bateson - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):31-32.
Do We Need a Second-Order Science?M. A. Notturno - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):23-26.
Teaching philosophy of science to scientists: why, what and how.Till Grüne-Yanoff - 2014 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 4 (1):115-134.
Psychology of science: contributions to metascience.Barry Gholson (ed.) - 1989 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The perverse effects of competition on scientists' work and relationships.Melissa S. Anderson, Emily A. Ronning, Raymond De Vries & Brian C. Martinson - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (4):437-461.
Consensus and Evolution in Science.Gonzalo Munevar - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:120 - 129.
The advancement of science, and its burdens: the Jefferson lecture and other essays.Gerald James Holton - 1986 - New York: Cambridge University.
Naturalized philosophy of science with a plurality of methods.David Stump - 1992 - Philosophy of Science 59 (3):456-460.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-11-15

Downloads
13 (#1,031,809)

6 months
1 (#1,462,504)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stuart Umpleby
George Washington University

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references