- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Fact, hypothesis and convention in Poincaré and Duhem
Philosophia Scientiae 3 (2):75-94 (1998)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Les voies du positivisme en France et en Autriche: Poincaré, Duhem et Mach.Anastasios Brenner - 1998 - Philosophia Scientiae 3 (2):31-42.
“A-Priorism” in Poincaré, Eddington & Milne.Mogens Wegener - 1996 - Philosophia Scientiae 1 (S1):81-103.
Poincaré: conservative methodologist but revolutionary scientist.Donald Gillies - 1996 - Philosophia Scientiae 1 (4):59-67.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-03-24
Downloads
0
6 months
0
2014-03-24
Downloads
0
6 months
0
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The complete Duhemian underdetermination argument: scientific language and practice.Karen Merikangas Darling - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (3):511-533.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-5pqs9 uwo