Taking the language stance in a material word: A comprehension study

Pragmatics and Cognition 17 (3):573-595 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper investigates a special kind of social meaning-making manifest in how we experience static objects and properties of our everyday world. This happens, for example, when we recognize objects like vacuum cleaners, sliced tomatoes, and sneakers as placed in special sites in the environment. Given the compositional features of such images, we see them as designed to accomplish communicative functions. It is argued that object configurations of this kind are recognized as externalized ostensive cues. They are seen as having been created with the intention of setting off an intersubjective mode of perception. This significantly changes the perceiver's semiotic exploration of the scene. From a `private' mode of sense-making mostly structured by reference to episodic, autobiographical experiential content, the perceiver takes a language stance. In other words, the perceiver adopts a qualitatively different meaning-constructing strategy in dealing with such images. Defending this claim, we present evidence from an empirical investigation of 20 participants' construals of photographic images depicting everyday static objects. We show that a subset of these object configurations evoke a special kind of socially responsive attitude as manifested in participants' introspective reports. The importance of these findings is brought out by discussion of parallels in neuro-cognitive work and how ostensive cues influence infant behavior

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
23 (#160,613)

6 months
11 (#1,140,922)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Defining art historically.Jerrold Levinson - 1979 - British Journal of Aesthetics 19 (3):21-33.
Material symbols.Andy Clark - 2006 - Philosophical Psychology 19 (3):291-307.
What monet meant: Intention and attention in understanding art.Mark Rollins - 2004 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 62 (2):175–188.
Coordinating with each other in a material world.Herbert H. Clark - 2005 - Discourse Studies 7 (4-5):507-525.

Add more references