Natural resources, sustaining capacity and technologic development

Global Bioethics 12 (1-4):99-105 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Modem economics relied on the false presupposition that natural resources are free goods. It gave rise to exaggerated expectations on the side of economists concerning the possibilities of economic growth. I try to interpret the terms of natural resources, sustaining capacity, production from a human-ecological platform. The quantity of natural resources may vary within a large spectrum between absolute abundance and total exhaustion. The support capacity can be raised in different ways. Extensive growth is wrong while technological development is a good way. So, certain technological-market processes aiming at extensive growth must be suppressed, processes that could increase effectivity and technical developments, which would draw new resources into production, should be supported.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is it processing capacity that is being defined?David Navon - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):841-842.
The evolution of sustainability.Charles V. Kidd - 1992 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 5 (1):1-26.
Response to Edmund N. Santurri.David Novak - 2013 - Journal of Religious Ethics 41 (3):551-554.
An Alternative to the Common Heritage Principle.Mark Michael - 1987 - Environmental Ethics 9 (4):351-371.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-21

Downloads
15 (#943,292)

6 months
1 (#1,464,097)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Janos Toth
Eotvos Lorand University of Sciences

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Tragedy of the Commons.Garrett Hardin - 1968 - Science 162 (3859):1243-1248.

Add more references