Searle's derivation of promissory obligation

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,879

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-01-26

Downloads
54 (#214,303)

6 months
1 (#386,016)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Savas L. Tsohatzidis
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (mirror)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Contractualist Account of Promising.Michael J. Cholbi - 2002 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 40 (4):475-91.
Problems with Searle’s Derivation?Edmund Wall - 2011 - Philosophia 39 (3):571-580.
Promise as Practice Reason.Hanoch Sheinman - 2008 - Acta Analytica 23 (4):287-318.
The Hybrid Nature of Promissory Obligation.Neal A. Tognazzini - 2007 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 35 (3):203–232.
Spinoza and the Antimony of Promissory Obligation.Kevin Zanelotti - 2000 - Southwest Philosophy Review 17 (1):69-76.
Searle’s Derivation of ‘Ought’ From ‘Is’.Dennis A. Rohatyn - 1973 - Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 22:121-138.
A Note on John R. Searle's Derivation of 'Ought' From 'Is'.Harald Ofstad & Lars Bergström - 1965 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 8 (1-4):309-314.