Bernard Linsky
University of Alberta
The article describes the background of Roman Ingarden's 1922 review of Leon Chwistek's book Wielość rzeczywistości, and the back-and-forth that followed. Despite the differences, the two shared some interesting similarities. Both authors had important ties to the intellectual happenings outside Poland and were not considerd mainstream at home. In the end, however, it is these connections that allowed them to gain recognition. Ingarden, who had been a student of Husserl, became the leading phenomenologist in the postwar Poland. For Chwistek, a painter, philosopher, and logician interested in Russell’s work, such connections meant that he won the competition for a professorship at the university in Lwów over Alfred Tarski. Until recently, Chwistek’s place in Polish logic remains unclear and Ingarden’s interactions with Polish logic and the Vienna Circle have not been investigated extensively. A deeper look at this intellectual fracas between Ingarden and Chwistek helps one in the study of the complicated mesh of alliances within the Lwów-Warsaw School. The article also identifies the origins of the split between phenomenology and the analytic philosophical tradition in Poland. The article is also accompanied by the translations of the reviews.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.15173/jhap.v10i5.4902
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,634
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Sense and Sensibilia.J. L. AUSTIN - 1962 - Oxford University Press.
The Problems of Philosophy.Bertrand Russell - 1912 - Home University Library.
Fiction and Metaphysics.Amie L. Thomasson - 1998 - Cambridge University Press.
Sense and Sensibilia.J. L. Austin - 1962 - Oxford University Press USA.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

“The Tragedy of Verbal Metaphysics” by Leon Chwistek.Adam Trybus & Bernard Linsky - 2017 - Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 5 (1).
Find the Poles in 'Blue Poles'.Christina Slade & Maryanne del Gigante - 1996 - Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis 17 (2):115-122.
Poles Who Are Not Poles.Donald Attwater - 1944 - New Blackfriars 25 (292):259-265.
Possible Worlds Semantics.Daniel Nolan - 2012 - In Gillian Russell & Delia Fara (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Language. New York, USA: Routledge Press. pp. 242-252.
Impossible Worlds.Mark Jago - 2013 - Noûs 47 (3):713-728.
Impossible Worlds.Daniel Nolan - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (4):360-372.
Impossibility and Impossible Worlds.Daniel Nolan - 2021 - In Otavio Bueno & Scott Shalkowski (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Modality. New York, USA: Routledge Press. pp. 40-48.
What Are Impossible Worlds?Barak Krakauer - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (3):989-1007.
Topological Trees: G H von Wright's Theory of Possible Worlds.David H. Sanford - 1998 - In TImothy Childers (ed.), The Logica Yearbook. Acadamy of Sciences of the Czech Republic.
The Ontology of Impossible Worlds.David A. Vander Laan - 1997 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 38 (4):597-620.


Added to PP index

Total views
1 ( #1,558,399 of 2,533,668 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #389,210 of 2,533,668 )

How can I increase my downloads?


Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes