- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Metaethics of Constitutional Adjudication
Oxford University Press (2017)
Abstract
Analysis of case law from the US, Germany, South Africa, Canada, Israel, and the ECtHR forms the basis of Tripkovic's exploration of constitutional adjudication from an antirealist standpoint. This highly original work identifies the salient value-based arguments in constitutional practice and exposes the implicit assumptions that lie therein.
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
The metaethics of constitutional adjudication: by Boško Tripković, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2018, 272 pp., £ 63.00 (hbk), ISBN: 9780198808084.Kyle L. Murray - 2019 - Jurisprudence 11 (1):140-149.
The Idea of a Living Constitution.Dr Aileen Kavanagh - 2003 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 16 (1):55-89.
The Idea of a Living Constitution.Aileen Kavanagh - 2003 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 16 (1):55-89.
Legal Theory in the Crucible of Constitutional Justice: A Study of Judges and Political Morality in Canada, Ireland, and Italy.Rory O'Connell - 2000 - Dartmouth Publishing Company.
Internality V. Externality in Constitutional Interpretation.Douglas George Lind - 1991 - Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania
Balancing, Proportionality and Constitutional Rights.Giorgio Bongiovanni & Chiara Valentini - 2011 - In Colin Aitken, Amalia Amaya, Kevin D. Ashley, Carla Bagnoli, Giorgio Bongiovanni, Bartosz Brożek, Cristiano Castelfranchi, Samuele Chilovi, Marcello Di Bello, Jaap Hage, Kenneth Einar Himma, Lewis A. Kornhauser, Emiliano Lorini, Fabrizio Macagno, Andrei Marmor, J. J. Moreso, Veronica Rodriguez-Blanco, Antonino Rotolo, Giovanni Sartor, Burkhard Schafer, Chiara Valentini, Bart Verheij, Douglas Walton & Wojciech Załuski (eds.), Handbook of Legal Reasoning and Argumentation. Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer Verlag. pp. 581-612.
Rethinking the Role of Empirical Social Science in American Constitutional Adjudication.Shu-Perng Hwang - 2010 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 96 (3):368-396.
Nonconstitutional Amendments.Richard Albert - 2009 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 22 (1):5-47.
Proportionality in Action: Comparative and Empirical Perspectives on the Judicial Practice.Mordechai Kremnitzer, Talya Steiner & Andreja Lang (eds.) - 2020 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-01-18
Downloads
3 (#1,728,901)
6 months
2 (#1,259,626)
2018-01-18
Downloads
3 (#1,728,901)
6 months
2 (#1,259,626)
Historical graph of downloads
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-sz9d2 uwo