Attending to the Theology of the Story of Adam and Eve

Journal of Analytic Theology 5:601-612 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In response to Hud Hudson's The Fall and Hypertime, I raise the question as to whether it is constructive to to use the story of Adam, Eve, and the Fall to make a specific apologetic point that draws attention to a reading of the story that we would not otherwise want to affirm?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,038

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Story and Story-World.Amos N. Wilder - 1983 - Interpretation 37 (4):353-364.
Can Origen Help Us Understand Adam?David W. Opderbeck - 2018 - New Blackfriars 99 (1083):561-577.
The Fall Paradox.Thom Brooks - 2007 - Philosophy and Theology 19 (1-2):3-5.
Story Identity and Story Type.Aaron Smuts - 2009 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 67 (1):5-14.
Theology and Ethics Then, Now, and In-Between at Union Seminary and Elsewhere.Douglas F. Ottati - 2012 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 66 (4):383-395.
A Theology in Outline: Can These Bones Live?Robert W. Jenson & Adam Eitel (eds.) - 2016 - Oxford University Press USA.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-04-12

Downloads
22 (#710,008)

6 months
5 (#641,095)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrew Torrance
University of St. Andrews

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Fall and Hypertime.Hud Hudson - 2014 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Genesis, a Commentary.Gerhard von Rad - 1961 - Religious Studies 10 (3):360-362.

Add more references