Advocacy, Autonomy, and Citizenship in the Classroom

Teaching Ethics 15 (1):173-189 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Should professors engage in classroom advocacy? One argument against such advocacy is the autonomy argument offered by Joel Kupperman. Advocacy, in the sense that Kupperman is concerned with, undermines a student’s making informed decisions about important issues. This paper seeks to do three things. First, it seeks to clarify Kupperman’s autonomy argument.Second, this paper extends the argument against advocacy by buttressing the autonomy argument with an argument from citizenship. This will strengthen Kupperman’s general rule against advocacy by expanding beyond concerns merely with individuals to cases where the concern is with groups, at least where the groups are composed of citizens.Last, while the autonomy argument provides a general prohibition against advocacy, it might permit exceptions, as does the citizenship argument. Thus, final part of this paper considers business ethics courses as a possible example for where exceptions might take place.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 79,912

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Advocating Values.Mike W. Martin - 1997 - Teaching Philosophy 20 (1):19-34.
Global Government and Global Citizenship.Alan Tomhave - 2013 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (2):287-297.
Integrating Advocacy and Environmental Education: A Response to Burns & Norris.Blair Niblett - 2012 - Paideusis: Journal of the Canadian Philosophy of Education Society 20 (1):4-13.


Added to PP

20 (#581,508)

6 months
1 (#479,521)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references