In defense of neuro-perceptual isomorphism

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):774-775 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is argued that the notion of bridge locus is compatible with distributed representation and brain interconnectivity. Isomorphism is not a dogmatic condition on explanatory adequacy but a refutable hypothesis, superior to Dennett's proposed alternatives. The assumption of type-type neuro-perceptual correspondences is more parsimonious than multiple realizability.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytic isomorphism and speech perception.Irene Appelbaum - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):748-749.
Filling-in is for finding out.Luiz Pessoa, Evan Thompson & Alva Noë - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):781-796.
Perceptual systems: Five+, one, or many?Nigel J. T. Thomas - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (2):241-242.
Border crossings: Perceptual and post-perceptual object representation.Tyler Burge - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (3):125-125.
Consciousness – subject to agreement.Neil Law Malcolm - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):963-964.
Backdrop, flat, and prop: The stage for active perceptual inquiry.Julian Hochberg - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):414-415.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
9 (#1,281,906)

6 months
39 (#100,216)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dejan Todorovic
University of Belgrade

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references