Ability, action, and context

Abstract

This paper proposes a formalization of ability that is motivated in part by linguistic considerations and by the philosophical literature in action theory and the logic of ability, but that is also meant to match well with planning formalisms, and so to provide an account of the role of ability in practical reasoning. Some of the philosophical literature concerning ability, and in particular [Austin, 1956], suggests that some ways of talking about ability are context-dependent. I propose a way of formalizing this dependency.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
91 (#184,991)

6 months
5 (#633,186)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Richmond Thomason
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Citations of this work

Agentive Modals.Matthew Mandelkern, Ginger Schultheis & David Boylan - 2017 - Philosophical Review 126 (3):301-343.
Does Success Entail Ability?David Boylan - 2021 - Noûs 56 (3):570-601.
Abilities.John Maier - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Two puzzles about ability can.Malte Willer - 2020 - Linguistics and Philosophy 44 (3):551-586.
Deterministic Chance.Antony Eagle - 2010 - Noûs 45 (2):269 - 299.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

What 'must' and 'can' must and can mean.Angelika Kratzer - 1977 - Linguistics and Philosophy 1 (3):337--355.
A Defense of Conditional Excluded Middle.Robert C. Stalnaker - 1981 - In William Leonard Harper, Robert Stalnaker & Glenn Pearce (eds.), Ifs. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. pp. 87-104.

View all 12 references / Add more references