The Ethics of Evangelism: A Philosophical Defense of Proselytizing and Persuasion

Ivp Academic (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Why do religious people attempt to persuade others of their beliefs? What are the current objections to the religious practice of proselytizing? Is proselytizing an ethically defensible practice? Are there kinds of proselytizing activities that are ethically questionable? Elmer John Thiessen responds to questions like these in an effort to provide a philosophical defense of proselytization, or religious persuasion, as an ethical practice. Thiessen examines and refutes current cultural and academic objections to religious proselytizing and offers a thorough ethics of evangelism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

In defence of proselytizing.H. E. Baber - 2000 - Religious Studies 36 (3):333-344.
Elmer Thiessen and the Ethics of Evangelism.John Tillson - 2013 - Journal of Education and Christian Belief 17 (2):243-258.
A Review of Elmer John Thiessen, Teaching for Commitment. [REVIEW]B. Spieker - 1996 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 15 (3):281-291.
What's wrong with deliberately proselytizing patients?Russell DiSilvestro - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (7):22 – 24.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-23

Downloads
50 (#327,050)

6 months
7 (#491,733)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Elmer John Thiessen
University of Waterloo (PhD)

Citations of this work

Is all formative influence immoral?John Tillson - 2018 - Ethics and Education 13 (2):208-220.
Dispositions and Influences.Alexander D. Carruth - 2021 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 41 (1):113-116.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references