Weddings and Counter-Stereotypic Couples

Social Theory and Practice 47 (4):789-807 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article, I argue that opposite-sex couples planning weddings have a duty to make their choices in ways that undermine the harmful norms that lead to most women taking their husband’s last names when they marry, and most weddings being extremely expensive. This duty, however, is not a duty to significantly reduce the prevalence of those norms, since doing so is generally not in the power of individual couples. Rather, it is a duty to provide observing couples around them with new live options for their own weddings.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Marriage and the Metaphysics of Bodily Union.Rebekah Johnston - 2013 - Social Theory and Practice 39 (2):288-312.
Peter Olsthoorn, Honor in Political and Moral Philosophy.Whitley Kaufman - 2015 - Social Theory and Practice 41 (4):755-758.
From Marriage to Political Leadership: Lessons in Social Competencies from the Igbo Conception of Marriage.Emmanuel Ifeanyi Ani - 2014 - Thought and Practice: A Journal of the Philosophical Association of Kenya 6 (1):49.
Vibrant Matter. [REVIEW]Bryan E. Bannon - 2011 - Environmental Philosophy 8 (1):121-124.
Vibrant Matter. [REVIEW]Bryan E. Bannon - 2011 - Environmental Philosophy 8 (1):121-124.
Eco-Sufficiency and Global Justice. [REVIEW]Meg Mott - 2009 - Environmental Philosophy 6 (2):103-105.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-11-05

Downloads
18 (#836,872)

6 months
4 (#798,951)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rosa Terlazzo
University of Rochester

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references