Antique paradigm of technology

Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 9:78-88 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The purpose is to find out the specifics of the ancient paradigm of technology. Task: to determine the ancient worldview universals that define ancient picture of the world; find out the meaning of the ancient concept of «techne». Methodology. To perform the tasks it was used the paradigm approach to the historical transformation technology, and was made historical reconstruction and explication of the production and development of technology in antiquity. Using a functional approach has revealed a close, the inextricable link between the constitution and functioning of ancient technology and ancient philosophical universals. The elements of scientific novelty is, first, the paradigm approach to historical transformation technology, and secondly, research technology within the ideological world view that is due to the domination of ancient philosophical wagon filled with new content, different from the archaic paradigm of technology and paradigms machinery Ancient East. Conclusions.Proved that historical transformation technology primarily due to dramatic changes philosophical Universal, which in turn lead to a new world and a new content and technology space in it. Proved that the development of technology and its inclusion in an ideological view of the world contributed to several factors: first, the ancient world view is no longer a purely mythological, woven natural-philosophical ideas about the universe; basis of ancient philosophy cosmocentrism with signs of logocentrism. Second, the ability to think through concepts, form them, allowing isolate rational considerations of practical everyday experience was the great achievement of ancient philosophy, the first attempt at scientific understanding of the world, the precondition and foundation of science as such. Thirdly, purely mechanical, technical model of the world that started the ancient Greek philosophers, initiated the transition to a scientific rational explanation of nature, unlike the previous one - irrational and mystical. Fourth, despite the fact that ancient man was still dependent on the nature of space needed, he was sufficiently autonomous from traditional models of life and behaviour in the implementation of his career. Fifthly, the principle of creative development, production of the new, which was characteristic of the macrocosm, nature, spread his microcosm - man.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Antique paradigm of technology.О. F. Tereshkun - 2016 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 9:78-88.
Philosophy of technology of Jose Ortega y Gasset.Oksana F. Tereshkun - 2015 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 7:111-123.
Philosophy of technology of Jose Ortega Y gasset.Oksana F. Tereshkun - 2015 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 7:111-123.
Technological Paradigm in Ancient Taoism.Alessandro Tomasi - 2009 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 13 (3):190-205.
Technological Paradigm in Ancient Taoism.George Teschner & Alessandro Tomasi - 2009 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 13 (3):190-205.
Civilization and historical anthropology aspects of the education «Greek Miracle».Spartak Sh Aytov - 2013 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 4:25-32.
The Metaphysics of Technology.David Skrbina - 2014 - New York: Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-10-06

Downloads
1 (#1,918,470)

6 months
1 (#1,721,226)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Поняття «дух», «духовність» і «особистість»: Філософський зміст та взаємозв’язок.В. О Сабадуха - 2017 - Гуманітарний Вісник Запорізької Державної Інженерної Академії 68:98-110.
Философия и наука.К Ясперс - 2008 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 17 (3):227-238.
Мысль об истории мысли. [REVIEW]И.В Тункина & С.П Щавелев - 2013 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 38 (4):235-240.

Add more references