The concept of measurement-precision

Synthese 190 (2):189-202 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The science of metrology characterizes the concept of precision in exceptionally loose and open terms. That is because the details of the concept must be filled in—what I call narrowing of the concept—in ways that are sensitive to the details of a particular measurement or measurement system and its use. Since these details can never be filled in completely, the concept of the actual precision of an instrument system must always retain some of the openness of its general characterization. The idea that there is something that counts as the actual precision of a measurement system must therefore always remain an idealization, a conclusion that would appear to hold very broadly for terms and the concepts they express

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-08-07

Downloads
154 (#127,145)

6 months
25 (#118,899)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Old and New Problems in Philosophy of Measurement.Eran Tal - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (12):1159-1173.
Measuring effectiveness.Jacob Stegenga - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 54:62-71.
Making Time: A Study in the Epistemology of Measurement.Eran Tal - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (1):297-335.
Measurement in Science.Eran Tal - 2015 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The law‐idealization.Paul Teller - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (5):730-741.

Add more references