Justifying Knowledge Claims After the Private Language Argument

In Sorin Costreie (ed.), Early Analytic Philosophy – New Perspectives on the Tradition. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Wittgenstein’s Private Language Argument was received within the Pittsburgh School of Philosophy as raising new and interesting difficulties for the traditional empiricist model of knowledge justification. While McDowell’s attempt to solve the difficulties in question is still debated, I claim that a different solution to the same difficulties might have been suggested by Wittgenstein himself in On Certainty.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Defence of Wittgenstein's Private Language Argument.Kichang Nam - 1993 - Dissertation, Michigan State University
Wittgenstein's Private Language Argument.George Wrisley - 2011-09-16 - In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 350–354.
Does the Tractatus Contain a Private Language Argument?William Child - 2013 - In Peter M. Sullivan & Michael D. Potter (eds.), Wittgenstein's Tractatus: history and interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 143-169.
Wittgenstein.David Pears - 1996 - In Nicholas Bunnin & Eric Tsui-James (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 811–826.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-17

Downloads
9 (#1,281,906)

6 months
2 (#1,259,876)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gheorghe Stefanov
University of Bucharest

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references