Nonsmokers-only hiring policies: personal liberty vs. promoting public health

Ethics and Behavior 32 (4):359-373 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACT There is a fierce debate about nonsmokers-only hiring policies, also referred to as no-nicotine hiring policies and “tobacco free” hiring policies. The favorable outcomes of no-nicotine hiring policies include reduced health costs, improved worker productivity, enhanced organizational image, and symbolic messaging. The unfavorable consequences of such policies include violating personal liberty, risking a “slippery slope” to other health-compromising behaviors, exacerbating socio-economic disparities, and discriminating against smokers. No-nicotine hiring policies have not been adequately evaluated and a new approach is warranted. The new conditional employment policy for smokers is described with stipulations for the probationary period. Autonomy and fairness are frequently cited as ethical principles to analyze no-nicotine hiring policies. An analysis of ethical principles is presented for no-nicotine hiring policies and the new conditional employment policy. The ethical principle of fairness is rooted in the effectiveness of any policy. Therefore, an evaluation plan is described for the conditional employment policy to assess effectiveness and efficiency. The proposed policy provides a powerful incentive to overcome smoking addictions, preserve the ethical principles of autonomy and fairness, as well as bridge the divide between personal liberty and personal responsibility.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,636

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Food and Beverage Policies and Public Health Ethics.David B. Resnik - 2013 - Health Care Analysis 23 (2):122-133.
diVeRsity and the Flexible sUbject in the langUage oF sPoUsal/PaRtneR hiRing Policies.Amy Koerber - 2012 - In Elizabeth A. Flynn, Patricia Sotirin & Ann Brady (eds.), Feminist rhetorical resilience. Logan: Utah State University Press. pp. 116.
COVID-19 and Affirmative Action: A Response.Phila M. Msimang - 2022 - Filosofia Theoretica: Journal of African Philosophy, Culture and Religions 11 (2):127-148.
Liability-Driven Ethics: The Impact on Hiring Practices.Sheri Smith - 1994 - Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (3):321-333.
Hiring Ethics.Salvador G. Villegas & Kristi M. Bockorny - 2020 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 17:285-290.
Limited Aggregation and E-Cigarettes.James Edgar Lim - 2020 - Nicotine and Tobacco Research 23 (1):21-25.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-09-23

Downloads
21 (#1,012,268)

6 months
3 (#1,480,774)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The case for banning cigarettes.Kalle Grill & Kristin Voigt - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (5):293-301.
The Smoking Penalty: Distributive Justice or Smokism?Martin J. Lecker - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 84 (S1):47 - 64.
Tobacco bans and smokers’ autonomy.Daniel Halliday - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (5):303-304.

Add more references