Self-control and Akrasia

In Kevin Timpe, Meghan Griffith & Neil Levy (eds.), Routledge Companion to Free Will. New York: Routledge (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Akratic actions are often being thought to instantiate a paradigmatic self-control failure. . If we suppose that akrasia is opposed to self-control, the question is how akratic actions could be free and intentional. After all, it would seem that it is only if an action manifests self-control that it can count as free. My plan is to explore the relation between akrasia and self-control. The first section presents what I shall call the standard conception, according to which akrasia and self-control are contraries, and introduces the puzzle that this conception raises. The second section turns to the arguments for and against the possibility of free and intentional akratic actions. The third section questions the claim that akratic actions are necessarily opposed to actions manifesting self-control.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Irrationality: A precis.Alfred R. Mele - 1988 - Philosophical Psychology 1 (2):173-177.
Emotions, Reasons, and Autonomy.Christine Tappolet - 2014 - In Andrea Veltman & Mark Piper (eds.), Autonomy, Oppression, and Gender. New York, USA: Oxford University Press USA. pp. 163-180.
Epistemic Akrasia.David Owens - 2002 - The Monist 85 (3):381-397.
A Critique of Alfred R Mele’s Work on Autonomous Agents: From Self-Control to Autonomy. [REVIEW]Pujarini Das - 2018 - Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research, Springer India:1995.
Faiblesse de la volonté et autonomie.Christine Tappolet - 2009 - In René Lefebvre & Alonso Tordesillas (eds.), Faiblesse de la volonté et maîtrise de soi. Presses Universitaires de Rennes. pp. 191-203.
Outcomes of Internal Conflicts in the Sphere of Akrasia and Self-Control.Alfred R. Mele - 2004 - In Peter Baumann & Monika Betzler (eds.), Practical Conflicts: New Philosophical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 262.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-03-31

Downloads
1,032 (#13,814)

6 months
236 (#12,799)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christine Tappolet
Université de Montréal

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What we owe to each other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
The moral problem.Michael Smith - 1994 - Cambridge, Mass., USA: Blackwell.
Intention.G. E. M. Anscombe - 1957 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon - 2002 - Mind 111 (442):323-354.
The Language of Morals.Richard Mervyn Hare - 1952 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

View all 61 references / Add more references