Commentary on wójcicki: Not pragmatic enough

Abstract

Prof. Wójcicki calls his position ‘radically pragmatist’. I will argue, however, that it is not nearly pragmatic enough. In particular, I will argue that his view is not pragmatist enough in three vital respects - even though it greatly improves upon how these issues have been traditionally dealt with.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Norton Versus Callicott on Interpreting Aldo Leopold: A Jamesian View.Piers Stephens - 2018 - In Ben A. Minteer & Sahotra Sarkar (eds.), A Sustainable Philosophy—the Work of Bryan Norton. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 113-133.
How Pragmatist was Sellars? Reflections on an Analytic Pragmatism.James O'Shea - 2020 - In Stefan Brandt & Anke Breunig (eds.), Wilfrid Sellars and Twentieth-Century Philosophy. New York: Routledge. pp. 110–29.
Who’s Calling Wittgenstein a Pragmatist?Judy M. Hensley - 2012 - European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 4 (2).
Grim news from the original position: a reply to Professor Doyal.D. Benatar - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (10):577-577.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
3 (#1,729,579)

6 months
3 (#1,046,015)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Konrad Talmont-Kaminski
University of Bialystok

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references