Compositionality without word boundaries: (the) more and (the) most

Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 22 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper seeks to illustrate the advantages of not treating phonological words as distinguished building blocks in compositional semantics. Following Bobaljik 2012, we derive the relative readings of amount superlatives in two steps, [[[d-many] comparative] superlative]. The existence of two comparative constructions is revealed, involving more vs. the more. Each builds a different superlative construction, explaining the conflicting intuitions about superlatives in the literature, as well as puzzles relating to the definite article in superlatives.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-06-05

Downloads
441 (#42,584)

6 months
67 (#65,122)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Anna Szabolcsi
New York University

Citations of this work

Generalized Update Semantics.Simon Goldstein - 2019 - Mind 128 (511):795-835.
Constraints on the lexicalization of logical operators.Roni Katzir & Raj Singh - 2013 - Linguistics and Philosophy 36 (1):1-29.
Scopability and sluicing.Chris Barker - 2013 - Linguistics and Philosophy 36 (3):187-223.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

A theory of focus interpretation.Mats Rooth - 1992 - Natural Language Semantics 1 (1):75-116.
Reference to Kinds across Language.Gennaro Chierchia - 1998 - Natural Language Semantics 6 (4):339-405.
Quantification.Anna Szabolcsi - 2010 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 17 references / Add more references