A formalization of Geach's antinomy

Analysis 36 (4):203 (1976)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

A Formalization of Geach's Antinomy.John David Stone - 1976 - Analysis 36 (4):203 - 207.
Linguistic aspects, meaninglessness and paradox: A rejoinder to John David stone. [REVIEW]Laurence Goldstein - 1980 - Linguistics and Philosophy 4 (4):579 - 592.
On the Representation if States of Affairs in the Antinomy of Future Contingents.Paweł Garbacz - 2018 - Roczniki Filozoficzne 66 (4):55-80.
On a Misunderstanding of Geach's.R. M. Hare - 1980 - Analysis 41 (1):64 -.
Geach's Analysis of Referring Phrases.Victor F. Van Neste - 1974 - Dissertation, Boston University Graduate School
Traits essentiels d'une formalisation adéquate.Gheorghe-Ilie Farte - 2020 - Argumentum. Journal of the Seminar of Discursive Logic, Argumentation Theory and Rhetoric 18 (1):163-174.
Intentional Identity and Reporting the Beliefs of Others.Geoffrey Currier Goddu - 1996 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst
A Trinity on a Trinity on a Trinity.John Zeis - 1993 - Sophia 32 (1):45 - 55.
Some Radical Consequences of Geach's Logical Theories.James Cain - 1985 - Analysis 45 (2):83 - 88.
David from Stone. [REVIEW]Sj Victor R. Yanitelli - 1958 - Renascence 11 (1):40-41.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-20

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references