“Mathematical” Schemes as Instruments of Interaction

Constructivist Foundations 3 (2):74-76 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the target article “Who Conceives of Society?” by Ernst von Glasersfeld. Excerpt: My goal in this commentary is to say enough to suggest that the meanings children impute to the language and actions of other children are based on their current conceptual schemes and that, if the schemes are at different levels of the constructive process, it is no easy feat for children to use their schemes in interactive mathematical communication

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why Private Meanings Are Incoherent.P. Meyer - 2008 - Constructivist Foundations 3 (2):79-81.
Operative Fictions, or: How to Talk About Society.S. J. Schmidt - 2008 - Constructivist Foundations 3 (2):67-68.
Sociology, Dynamic Critical Realism, and Radical Constructivism.C. Fuchs - 2008 - Constructivist Foundations 3 (2):97-99.
The Illusion of Society.M. C. Bettoni - 2008 - Constructivist Foundations 3 (2):68-69.
Is Ontology Necessary?A. Quale - 2008 - Constructivist Foundations 3 (2):81-82.
Who Conceives of the Individual?Jean-Louis le Moigne - 2008 - Constructivist Foundations 3 (2):69-71.
Skeptical Mathematics?R. Hersh - 2008 - Constructivist Foundations 3 (2):72-72.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-02

Downloads
2 (#1,822,311)

6 months
2 (#1,445,278)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references